Mortgage Rule Changes

Tracy Head • November 16, 2024

Things are picking up. I have seen a significant increase in the number of purchases I am working on with clients. I’ve done an informal poll of some of my realtor and broker friends and we are all seeing the same increase in activity.


This week I attended a learning session about the recent and upcoming changes to mortgage rules. This year it has felt like changes have been rolled out so often that its hard to stay on top of new policies.


I thought it might be good to go over some of these changes as they will benefit many homeowners and homebuyers. Please note that this is a quick explanation and you may have questions or need clarification on some of what follows so please make sure you speak with your mortgage professional before moving forward with a purchase.


In the order the changes were discussed in our session, here is a high-level overview for you.


Effective August 1, 2024 first-time home buyers (FTHB) were able to purchase a newly built home using a thirty year amortization with a minimum down payment. Prior to this change the maximum amortization allowed for buyers with less than twenty percent down was twenty-five years.


Key to note here is that the definition of a FTHB for purchasing homes is based on the CRA explanation of home buyers starting out or starting over; this includes buyers who have not owned their primary residence (nor lived in a home owned by their significant other) for the last four years. It also includes buyers who are recently separated or divorced.


Also key to note is that only one of the borrowers must qualify as a FTHB for these rules to apply.


For the purposes of Land Transfer Tax in BC, even if clients are considered FTHB under mortgage rules, they will still have to pay Land Transfer Tax if they have ever owned a home anywhere in the world.


There is a small increase to the insurance premium (,2 per cent) if borrowers elect to use the thirty year amortization. 

Effective December 15, 2024 the price cap for insured mortgages will be increased from $1,000,000 to $1,500,000. Clients will be able to purchase a home up to this price with a minimum down payment of five per cent of the first $500,000 and ten per cent of any balance over that and up to $1,500,000. For the full $1,500,000 the minimum down payment will now be $125,000 as compared to the previous minimum down payment of $300,000.


Trying to come up with the required twenty per cent down payment has been a barrier for many borrowers. 

The changes coming into effect December 15 also include the ability for repeat buyers to new builds with a thirty year amortization. 


As well, all FTHB will be eligible to qualify based on a thirty year amortization regardless of whether they are buying a newly built home or an existing home.


For these guidelines to apply mortgage applications must be submitted AFTER December 15.

The final change I’m going to touch on today rolls out effective January 15, 2025.


Existing homeowners will be able to refinance their homes up to ninety per cent of the as-improved value of their home if they are pulling equity to create a secondary suite in their home using a thirty year amortization.

What does “as-improved value” mean?


With these applications we will need to order an appraisal which shows the current value of the home as well as the value of the home once the proposed work is completed. 


Current rules limit refinances to eighty per cent of the value of the home so I see this as a significant benefit for clients who are maybe newer to the housing market and can really use the income from a secondary suite.


There are of course requirements for this program including:

  • Either the borrower or close family member must live in one unit of the property
  • You can add more than one unit to the home (up to a total of four) providing zoning allows for this
  • Units must be completely self-contained
  • Financing limit cannot exceed actual costs of the work


Is your head spinning yet? Mine certainly is, trying to keep all of these changes straight.

Many lenders are still determining their own policies as to how they choose to incorporate these rule changes into the mortgages they offer. It is important to speak with a mortgage professional to see how these changes may impact your borrowing power.

As I mentioned we are already seeing a definite increase in purchase activity. It will very interesting to see if there is a flurry of activity following the implementation of the December 15 changes as well.

Tracy Head

Mortgage Broker

GET STARTED

Marital Breakdown

By Tracy Head • October 18, 2025
One topic I haven’t tackled for a long time is marital breakdowns. When you are working your way through what is arguably one of the most difficult times of your adult life it’s important to know that you have options. There is a program available for refinancing your home specifically for spousal buyouts. Under this program we can refinance your home back up to 95 per cent of the value of the home and use the new funds to pay out your ex-partner and pay out marital debts (provided this is written into your separation agreement). Qualifying this to say that we can refinance to 95 per cent if the value of your home is under $500,000. If the value of your home is over $500,000 we need to ensure you have 5 per cent of the first $500,000 and 10 per cent of any value over the $500,000 left as equity in your home. It’s a small distinction but in the Okanagan the second calculation is the one I see the most. With recent changes to the First Time Home Buyer’s program we can now extend the amortization out as far as 30 years if needed to make the numbers work. It is important to note that this program is an insured program meaning that a premium is added to your mortgage so its important that you work with someone who is familiar with this program. You will require a finalized separation agreement to refinance to pay out the other party.  If you have significant equity in your home and we can make the numbers work a traditional refinance is also an option. In this case we can only increase your mortgage to 80 per cent of the value of your home but there is no default insurance premium required so this is usually the preferable option. A question to ask yourself is whether it makes sense to refinance your current home or to sell and buy a new home. The list of pros and cons will be different for each person, but one of the most important things to consider is whether or not you can afford the higher mortgage payment on your own to stay put. Also key to consider is whether or not you need the same space or whether downsizing might be another option. Do you have children that you want to keep in the same area and same school? Is your current home in a convenient location for work, school, and social activities? Or are you needing a fresh start somewhere new? If you find yourself in this situation and are considering your options with respect to refinancing your home I encourage you to reach out to a professional that can help you take a good hard look at your situation. Doing a bit of legwork upfront may help relieve at least one part of the mental load as you work your way through a separation or divorce.

Is this the right time to buy a home?

By Tracy Head • October 4, 2025
Is this the right time to buy a home? Who has your best interests at heart? Buying a home can be either an incredibly exciting experience or a very stressful time. Or it can be a combination of both. Part of the challenge can be committing to the decision to move forward with buying a home. How do you know if you are ready? How do you know if this is the right time to buy? I love working with first-time home buyers. I particularly love when they reach out well ahead of time to do their research and get their ducks in a row. I have been working with one such young lady. She has been watching for the right home to pop up. She fell in love with one of the listings that she viewed and moved forward with an offer. She reached out to her investment advisor to make arrangements to move the funds she needed for her deposit from her investments to her bank account. Oddly he did not reply to her three phone calls nor multiple emails. She was forced to walk into his office to deal with this. When she got there he essentially told her she was foolish for buying a home. She should leave her funds in her investments and continue to save with him. She agonized for a few days and ultimately collapsed her offer. He told her that this house, over the long run, was going to cost her $1,000,000. The purchase price was $650,000. The total of the purchase price plus interest over the long run seemed like an astronomical sum. He persuaded her that she would be better off continuing to rent and that at the end of the same time period she would have over $1,000,000 in her investment account. That’s all well and good in theory. In the meantime she still needs a place to live. And there are no guarantees as to what investments will do over time, nor what property values will do. I did some math to see what this actually looked like long term. We have to make some assumptions that the financial advisor is good at what he does and that her investments will do well over the long term. As a rule real estate appreciates over time and rent increases over time. That being said, here is the math I did. Making some assumptions that the mortgage rate stays the same and your rent never increases: $2400 rent per month x 360 months (30 years) = $864,000 $2833 per month mortgage payment x 360 months = 1,019,880 (monthly payments / I suggest you go bi-weekly to pay off quicker) At the end of 30 years renting you have nothing to show for the $864,000 you’ve paid out. At the end of 30 years paying your mortgage you will have a home free and clear – normally real estate increases in value over time so in theory it will be worth way more than what you’ve paid. If you wait another year to buy $2400 x 12 = $28,800 towards someone else’s mortgage. Here’s the wild card. If you choose to rent and choose to invest in a portfolio instead of buying, even if your portfolio is worth $1,000,000 at the end of the same time frame you need to subtract the $864,000 you paid in rent. This leaves you with a net gain of $136,000. If you had purchased a home, your payments of $1,019,880 would be offset by the value of the home you purchased. In this case, assuming no change in value, you now have a home worth $650,000 paid off. The wild card to run these comparisons is how much you need to invest monthly to accumulate the $1,000,000. Either way, you are making this payment on top of your rent payment. Another wild card of course is what property values and investment portfolios do over time. We know rent will continue to increase and mortgage rates will change but I think it warrants looking at this from another perspective. I am not a proponent of aggressive scare tactics so was disappointed in how this advisor handled his conversation with her.  Some people are more cautious with their financial plans and I appreciate that. Being certain about your long-term goals will help you navigate the path forward that suits your own situation. Make sure you have trusted people in your corner as you make these big life decisions.